SOC344 2020 Tut7 – Friday 12.30pm

Have you ever wanted to change how you look? Not just in terms of how you dress, but how you might alter your body? Some of us undertake cosmetic surgery in order look different: younger, slimmer, tighter, bigger, weirder, more radical, more normal, less normal, a different look, a different gender.

There are many motivations for these changes. Some want to alter their bodies to feel ‘more like the person they were always meant to be’, as an expression of individuality, authenticity, and identity. This is particularly true in the case of transgender persons, though it applies to many others. A lot of people exercise and work out to make their bodies look and feel healthier, and some argue that tattoos and piercings help people express difficult individual feelings in a uniquely public way. ‘Authenticity’ is a powerful motivator.

However, the drive for change to become an ‘authentic’ self is sometimes driven by a desire to look like someone else that we admire; a friend, a celebrity, or an influencer. Admiration is an important emotional motivation, denoting comparison, identification and appreciation of another’s qualities. However, other comparison-based emotions – anxiety and envy – are also extremely relevant. Many of us feel pressure and anxiety, not just to fit in and look ‘good enough’, but to look better than others and gain status. Gordon Clanton argues that if you find yourselves “thinking the other does not deserve their good fortune or wishing that the other would lose his or her advantage or otherwise suffer, that is a measure of your envy”. Have you ever thought that someone you know has it too easy because they are just lucky enough to just be good-looking? If you told them so, would they agree, would they tell you off for being ‘too envious,’ or would they encourage you to ‘embrace your envy,’ and work harder to look better?

Sometimes the anxious push and competition to look and act ‘better’ is not driven by status, but by the need to work. As more jobs orient towards customer service, it’s not only necessary to constantly manage feelings at work – to always smile and look happybut to really look the part – dress up, dress down, dress different, dress sexy. Paul Thompson and colleagues describe how companies hire workers who embody the ‘right’ qualities to sell their products; looks, style, mannerisms, emotional expressions, even the right voice in the case of call centre operators. They call this ‘aesthetic labour’, or the ‘supply of embodied capacities and attributes possessed by workers at the point of entry into employment’ (p931). Companies increasingly prioritise aesthetic labour in recruitment, and value and demand its constant development and use on the job to sell products and promote the company’s brand. Employees in Thompson’s study report being subject to the ‘grooming standards committee’ and ‘uniform police’, intent on regulating appearance and speech, through disciplinary action if necessary, to meet the employer’s aesthetic standards. Such aesthetic labour demands are now intensified by the widespread use of customer satisfaction ratings, particularly to allocate (more, better-quality) work in gig-industries like Uber and Task Rabbit; a grumpy day could cost you your job!

This commercialisation of bodies and emotional labour is also part of a broader phenomenon of commodification of emotions in digital economies. Jan Padios calls this ‘emotional extraction’, which includes emotional labour, but also predicting “everything from consumer choices to criminal activity” from the capture, use and sale of any “information and data that can be mined as a result of isolating and examining people’s emotions or affect” (p207). Our emotional data – our likes, our preferences, and (yes) our customer satisfaction ratings – are now products we give away (for free) to super-profitable behemoths (Facebook, Amazon, Google etc).

Body modification and emotional comportment is anything but a simple, individualised choice. They are highly social and emotional, bringing us the joy of authenticity, but also the thrill of elevated social status (and the relief of lesser envy). They are conflated with status; are tightly wound up with media images and the body-industry; are intrinsic to the aesthetic labour of the service economy; and engender emotions that become commodities for extraction in the wider digital economy.

Perhaps it is time their value was recognised and paid for?

 

#S344UOW20 #Tut7 #Fri1230

Posted in SOC327 - Emotions Bodies and Society, UOW.

6 Comments on SOC344 2020 Tut7 – Friday 12.30pm

Cassandra Ross said : Guest Report 4 years ago

I’m going to address my post to the concept of envy and admiration, scorn and pity. I found the Fiske reading very interesting, particularly with his assessment that viewing victims of stigmatised groups through a frame of pity (not attributing these people with a concept of mind) was in some way morally superior to the sensations of honest scorn. In my experiences, being treated with pity for your stigma is more offensive than outright scorn, because a hateful person realises they are being hateful. There is an honesty to it. Pity doesn’t seem to contain the appropriate anger at the mistreatment of the disabled or disfigured. Personally, spending more time with people from stigmatised groups and coming to regard them as friends has cut the hierarchy from the equation, though I wonder if there is some element of ‘These are good ones, not like those Other ones.’ Relating the desire to view people in a non hierarchical, or at least voluntarily hierarchical way, to the current state of emotional and aesthetic labour demanded by many capitalist workplaces. I can’t help but see emotional and aesthetic demands just another way to force the physically and mentally ill out of work. By the logics of the systems, I understand why a café manager doesn’t want a depressed zoomer doing front of house. I suppose to some extent this is because most patrons will not know the employee, so rude treatment will be taken more personally. If everyone knows the boss’ son is mopey, that becomes humanised, less surface level (as getting to know people from stigmatised groups). The question asks if people should be paid for their emotional labour. I would say yes, but I’m frustrated at how alienated we are from one another. Even if I can see no alternatives.

Tim Moore said : Guest Report 4 years ago

Look the part, dress the part, and go outside the lines when its most beneficial to my employers and the kind of work I’m doing within context to the type of service, aesthetic expectations, for me service-based hospitality roles. I have gone through different spectrums of certain expectations upon orientation as described by Yasmyn, dress this way, speak this way, use your emotions to sell this way and it all starts to feel like I’m being programmed like a robot. Padios (2017, p. 212) states services revolving around human connection or feeling states have filled the modern marketplace or in my example workplace, most require significant emotions to be displayed, enhanced or even eradicated. This effectively points to the way in which emotions and human connection are increasingly being commodified and measured in modern workplaces as to how much they manipulate emotion management, physical management to best sell a product or best sell the service being provided.I am currently in workplace that encourages flamboyance in both physical appearance and emotional display, I am encouraged to interact and strike up a chord with customers/clients and keep my emotions fluid and responsive. I am encouraged that I dress to reflect my personality and wear loud colours if desired because it’s appropriate in the inner-city Sydney hospitality industry to do so.Thompson et al. (2001) effectively asks is it more important to have knowledgeability of products and the service being delivery or the aesthetics and appearance it comes in? Should we revolutionise the contemporary labour force to become more knowledgeable in forms of emotion management or is it better just focus on the outward appearance and suppression of emotion to just look the part, sell the part, talk the part?

Yasmyn Molina said : Guest Report 4 years ago

I agree with Amelia on the clear disconnect between being individual and being employable. Contemporary society encourages our individual expression of identity and creative freedom, as displayed through the increasing acceptance of things like tattoos, non-natural coloured hair and piercings. It appears however that when it comes to the world of work and employment, the acceptance for creative individual self-expression is non-existent. As explained by Thompson et al. (2001), employees become part of the display and are products themselves to be sold to public eye. Employees are constantly on 'display' to customers; so having an organised aesthetic can attract customers (Thompson et al. 2001). At times, the requirements for employment can become extensive for what is clearly not enough compensation. I remember when I was hired at a fast food restaurant and, upon orientation, was talked through appearance expectations. During my employment, I was told I was not allowed to dye my hair extreme/unnatural or bright colours and had to have it styled in a specific way. I was not allowed long or fake nails or nail polish. Makeup was to be kept to a minimum if any was to be worn at all. Uniforms were expected to be ironed and I was told to keep a positive attitude. I had just graduated high school and felt these requirements were excessive considering this was only a fast food restaurant that I did not intend to stay at for very long. It felt as though my freedom to self-expression had been stripped for just a part time job that didn't even pay very well. Whilst this example sits on the milder end of aesthetic labour, I do believe that if employers demand aesthetic labour of their employees, it should be compensated for accordingly. Whilst not traditionally recognised as a form of labour, the effort and time put into aesthetic labour both inside and outside the workplace should be properly acknowledged as a form of labour. This does raise questions about current expectations in the workplace. How much aesthetic labour can/should we expect of different jobs? Is it right for some employers to demand more aesthetic labour than others? If so, which employers and what kind of jobs?

Shiralee Hartnett said : Guest Report 4 years ago

If individuals are required to engage with body modification and other forms of aesthetic labour for the purposes of employment, perhaps it is worth considering appropriate compensation. I have a number of friends who are beauty therapists who are expected to use the products that they sell whilst maintaining the appearance of healthy, glowing skin in the hope that their clients will ask “what products should I use to get the same effects as you?”. This also connects with Kate White’s point around individuals experiencing dissatisfaction with their bodies, specifically their skin in this example. This also suggests that beauty therapists are commodities who are expected to project a specific image to assist with marketing and sales. Partnered with the aesthetic labour expectations, beauty therapists are also expected to have adaptive personalities that will assist with building rapport with clients. Emotion management becomes apparent when therapists adapt to the emotions of their clients, eg. If a client is feeling sad, therapists will express empathy whilst validating their feelings. This is confirmed by Padios (2017, p. 212) who states “While a vast array of services revolving around human connection or feeling states has filled the modern marketplace, most if not all require or significantly involve emotions that must be displayed, enhanced, or even eradicated… which in turn necessitates the extraction of emotion from the workers, customers or clients involved”. Should the demands of aesthetic/emotional labour and emotional extraction from employers be compensated in the form of a pay rate loading or negotiated perks? #S344UOW20 #Tut7 #Fri1230

Amelia Smits said : Guest Report 4 years ago

There is a disconnect between being individual and being employable and it stems from societal perceptions of ‘appropriate’ body images. People may seek to display their authentic selves through body modifications such as tattoos or surgery or through less permanent modifications like hairstyles. This allows them to express their identity openly, but also exposes them to the negative stereotypes that are widely still associated with people outside the societal norms of beauty. Thompson et al. (2001, p. 931) explains that “having more aesthetically appealing staff … crudely attracts more customers” since staff are as much a product as what they are selling. While job hunting with pink hair, I found a reoccurring message from places associated with cleanliness, like food stores, that they would not accept my resume because of the image it would present to customers, even though hairnets were worn. In a society that encourages body modification such as plastic surgery but rejects individualism, has shame become hypocritical?

Kate White said : Guest Report 4 years ago

Body image has consistently been an issue that women and men in society have had to deal with. Body image and structure differs between cultural and social significance. Within the text 'Body Image : Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children' by Grogan, S she explains about what is considered the accepted body image within the western woman or man and how woman can be more incline to diet as apose to men who on the general scale feel more comfortable within themselves and wont conform to societies standards. Dissatisfaction of our bodies and putting ourselves down due to depression or mental illness surrounding our body or self worth can lead to body modification therefore catapulting that industry and creating more and more people who want to change themselves. Feeling authentic within yourself I believe is one of the only ways you can learn to love yourself in tern this projects psychological factors and predicting positive self body image. The term "BMI" or body mass index is a medical test calculating a persons height and weight and fitting them into a healthy or unhealthy category, I believe that it would only be necessary for that person to change their way of life if the BMI test indicated they were unhealthy and weren't able to sustain a healthy lone fulfilled life. Other then this people should feel happy within their own skin and not always compare themselves to social media platforms, editing schemes and societies idea of perfection, for this to happen the media should try and promote a "normal" body image and not something that the average everyday person cannot live up to. #S344UOW20 #Tut7 #Fri1230

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked